lancet-header

Preprints with The Lancet is a collaboration between The Lancet Group of journals and SSRN to facilitate the open sharing of preprints for early engagement, community comment, and collaboration. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision-making or presented without highlighting these facts. For more information, please see the FAQs.

A New Approach to Predict Cephalopelvic Disproportion, Based on Three-Dimension Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pelvic Reconstruction and Computer Simulated Labor: A Multicenter Prospective Study

26 Pages Posted: 24 Dec 2024

See all articles by Neng Jin

Neng Jin

Zhejiang University - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Wei-Zeng Zheng

Zhejiang University

Zhen-Yang Wang

Zhejiang University

Min Lv

Zhejiang University

Juan Li

Zhejiang University

Cheng Chen

Zhejiang University

Qiu-Min Zhu

Quzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital

Hui-Lian Bu

Zhejiang University

Haoji Hu

Zhejiang University

Ying Jiang

Zhejiang University

Yuan Chen

Zhejiang University

Baihui Zhao

Zhejiang University

Qiong Luo

Zhejiang University - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

More...

Abstract

Background: Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) often causes emergency cesarean section (CS), which increases the risk of maternal morbidity and surgical complications than elective cesarean delivery. How to predict CPD before labor has been the focus of researchers for years. Based on the three-dimension (3D) reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of maternal pelvis and fetal head, we developed a software of computer simulated labor named Natural birth prediction system, which could assess the proportionality of pelvis and fetus size. We conducted this research to assess the potential value of NBPS on predicting CPD and compare the value with a previous pelvimetry model and the fetal-pelvic index.

Methods: A multicenter prospective study was conducted between November 2023 and September 2024 in three hospitals in Zhejiang province,China. Singleton primiparas who were suspected with CPD and who were willing to attempt vaginal delivery were included. Exclusion criteria were nonvertex fetal presentation and contraindications for MRI. Women chose scheduled CS due to changes in their preferences or conditions such as preeclampsia, as well as those who underwent emergency CS for reasons like fetal distress, were excluded from the final analysis. Patients were categorized according to NBPS results (absence CPD, borderline CPD, and presence CPD). Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were collected. The software results were compared with actual delivery modes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to compare the predictive value of NBPS with another MRI model involving maternal body mass index, pelvimetry, and fetal measurements. For each model, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Findings: The final analysis included 303 patients. Among the 14 women identified as presence CPD by the NBPS, 12 underwent emergency CS due to CPD, while the rest two were deliverd vaginally with forceps assistance. Of the 213 patients deemed absence CPD by NBPS, 190 had normal vaginal deliveries, 22 delivered with forceps, and only one required an emergency CS due to CPD. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for NBPS model was 0.908, with a sensitivity of 97.0% and specificity of 78.5%. The PPV was 35.6%, and the NPV was 99.5%. In comparison, the AUC for the pelvimetry model was 0.827, with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 70.2%. The PPV was 28.4%, and the NPV was 96.4%. For the fetal-pelvic index, the sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% and 42.6%, and the PPV and NPV were 13.4% and 92.7%, respectively.

Interpretation: This study demonstrates that the novel software based on three-dimension reconstruction of the female pelvis and fetal head shows promise as a reliable tool for predicting CPD in clinical practice.

Funding: This work was supported by Scientific Research Foundation of the National Health Commission (WKJ-ZJ-2126), supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC2700700, 2022YFC2704600, 2022YFC2704601), supported by Medical and Health Program of Zhejiang Province (2022KY1229) and supported by Science Program of Quzhou (2023K186).

Declaration of Interest: All authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval: Approval was obtained from the ethics committee at the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine Zhejiang University (IRB-20230253-R). In addition, written informed consent was obtained from all women who agreed to participate.

Keywords: cephalopelvic disproportion, magnetic resonance imaging, three-dimension reconstruction, prediction

Suggested Citation

Jin, Neng and Zheng, Wei-Zeng and Wang, Zhen-Yang and Lv, Min and Li, Juan and Chen, Cheng and Zhu, Qiu-Min and Bu, Hui-Lian and Hu, Haoji and Jiang, Ying and Chen, Yuan and Zhao, Baihui and Luo, Qiong, A New Approach to Predict Cephalopelvic Disproportion, Based on Three-Dimension Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pelvic Reconstruction and Computer Simulated Labor: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5068610 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5068610

Neng Jin

Zhejiang University - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ( email )

Wei-Zeng Zheng

Zhejiang University ( email )

Zhen-Yang Wang

Zhejiang University ( email )

38 Zheda Road
Hangzhou, 310058
China

Min Lv

Zhejiang University ( email )

Juan Li

Zhejiang University ( email )

Cheng Chen

Zhejiang University ( email )

Qiu-Min Zhu

Quzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital ( email )

Hui-Lian Bu

Zhejiang University ( email )

Haoji Hu

Zhejiang University ( email )

38 Zheda Road
Hangzhou, 310058
China

Ying Jiang

Zhejiang University ( email )

Yuan Chen

Zhejiang University ( email )

Baihui Zhao

Zhejiang University ( email )

Qiong Luo (Contact Author)

Zhejiang University - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ( email )