Methodological Investigation of Boundary Thresholds for Delineating Ecologically Important Source Areas: A Case Study of Lhasa

24 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2025

See all articles by Tianxin LI

Tianxin LI

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Sun Aoni

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Zhao Likai

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Ding Feiyang

Newcastle University

Guo Hongyan

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Wang Xu

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Xiaomin Dou

Beijing Forestry University

Abstract

The delineation of ecological protection red lines is crucial for environmental conservation in critical ecological zones, particularly on the Tibetan Plateau, a key ecological highland in China. Accurately defining the scale and boundaries of ecological sources (ES) in such unique habitats presents a significant challenge due to the complex interplay between ecosystem service functions and spatial patch structures. Existing research often overlooks the uncertainties involved in determining the thresholds necessary to optimize ecological functions within reserves. This study aims to address these gaps by developing an integrated system for analyzing ES through evaluations of function, attributes, structure, and morphology. Combining assessments of ES functions, landscape patterns, spatial correlations, and fractal theory, we comprehensively analyze Lhasa’s ecological landscape. Five key factors—habitat capacity, habitat quality, water conservation, habitat connectivity, and habitat shape index—are employed to identify ES patches. The results indicate that a minimum patch area threshold of 20 km² is essential, with the total ES in Lhasa estimated at approximately 14,284.05 km². Landscape pattern analysis reveals that the contagion index (CONTAG) is a critical measure for evaluating landscape connectivity. When CONTAG values ranges between 85% and 98.26%, all five ecological function indicators perform optimally. Spatial autocorrelation analysis further refines the identification of potential ecological source areas. Fractal dimension analysis highlights patches with low stability, suggesting that glacier lands should expand outward and sparse woodlands and low-coverage grasslands should contract inward to enhance boundary complexity and internal stability. These adjustments result in a defined ES for Lhasa with a maximum scale threshold of approximately 15,342.52 km². This research provides a valuable framework for optimizing ecological protection red lines in Lhasa and offers methodological insights into defining ES thresholds in ecologically sensitive regions.

Keywords: Lhasa, Ecological source, Threshold study, Landscape pattern, Fractal dimension

Suggested Citation

LI, Tianxin and Aoni, Sun and Likai, Zhao and Feiyang, Ding and Hongyan, Guo and Xu, Wang and Dou, Xiaomin, Methodological Investigation of Boundary Thresholds for Delineating Ecologically Important Source Areas: A Case Study of Lhasa. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5099582 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5099582

Tianxin LI (Contact Author)

University of Science and Technology Beijing ( email )

30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District
beijing, 100083
China

Sun Aoni

University of Science and Technology Beijing ( email )

30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District
beijing, 100083
China

Zhao Likai

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Ding Feiyang

Newcastle University ( email )

Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 7RU
United Kingdom

Guo Hongyan

University of Science and Technology Beijing ( email )

30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District
beijing, 100083
China

Wang Xu

University of Science and Technology Beijing ( email )

30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District
beijing, 100083
China

Xiaomin Dou

Beijing Forestry University ( email )

35 Qinghua E Rd.
WuDaoKou
Beijing, 100085
China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
6
Abstract Views
83
PlumX Metrics