How Intellectual Property Ends

72 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2025

See all articles by Aaron Perzanowski

Aaron Perzanowski

University of Michigan Law School

Dave Fagundes

Emory University School of Law

Date Written: January 24, 2025

Abstract

Intellectual property rights, unlike rights in land and chattels, come to an end. Despite the doctrinal complexity and practical significance of IP’s terminal mechanisms, scholarship has scarcely focused on them, and none has analyzed these doctrines as a unified field. As a result, the discourse around IP’s terminal doctrines remains impoverished, with courts, legislatures, and commentators offering imprecise and inconsistent formulations that obscure the rationales for ending IP rights. This Article offers the first comprehensive taxonomy of IP’s terminal mechanisms, providing much-needed conceptual and definitional coherence. It then reveals the underappreciated policy leverage these mechanisms can deliver. Finally, it considers new and creative ways that IP’s terminal doctrines could be enlisted to address a range of IP policy concerns and what lessons, if any, traditional property law might learn from how IP ends.

Keywords: copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret, intellectual property, abandonment, invalidation, forfeiture, expiration

Suggested Citation

Perzanowski, Aaron and Fagundes, Dave, How Intellectual Property Ends (January 24, 2025). Emory Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5110147 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5110147

Aaron Perzanowski (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

United States

Dave Fagundes

Emory University School of Law ( email )

1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
230
Abstract Views
887
Rank
283,440
PlumX Metrics