Top-Two Runoff Elections (Uniquely) Dominate Plurality Rule

15 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2025 Last revised: 29 Jan 2025

Date Written: January 28, 2025

Abstract

Should states retain plurality rule or adopt a different voting method? We study the class of sequential plurality procedures, covering all widely-used single-winner election methods and proposals (including plurality, top-two runoffs, and instant runoff voting). We compare methods by whether a majority prefers the outcome of one method to that of another across all possible preference profiles. We show that a top-two runoff is the only procedure that robustly dominates plurality rule. All other methods perform better in some cases and worse in others. We further characterize the full set of dominance relations among sequential plurality procedures.

Keywords: Elections, Collective Decision Making, Electoral Reform, Voting Procedures

JEL Classification: D70, D72

Suggested Citation

Atkinson, Nathan and Friedman, Ezra, Top-Two Runoff Elections (Uniquely) Dominate Plurality Rule (January 28, 2025). Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1827, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 25-09, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5115210 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5115210

Nathan Atkinson (Contact Author)

University of Wisconsin Law School ( email )

975 Bascom Mall
Madison, WI 53706
United States

Ezra Friedman

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
74
Abstract Views
437
Rank
668,152
PlumX Metrics