Income inequality and the trade-off between socio-economic and ecological goals

35 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2025

See all articles by Svenja Flechtner

Svenja Flechtner

University of Siegen - School of Economic Disciplines

Martin Middelanis

Free University of Berlin (FUB) - Department of Business and Economics

Date Written: February 10, 2025

Abstract

At present, no country manages to meet basic social needs without exceeding ecological limits. However, there is considerable variation across countries in the amount of environmental degradation incurred to achieve given living standards. This paper investigates whether income inequality plays a moderating role in this trade-off. Using a cross-sectional panel approach with a global sample over the period from 1992 to 2015, we examine whether more income-equal countries achieve the same living standards with less environmental degradation. We find that lower inequality alleviates the trade-off between socioeconomic and ecological goals in lowincome and high-income countries: those with more equal income distributions achieve the same living standards at relatively lower ecological degradation levels. The opposite results in middle-income countries. We discuss patterns in the marginal propensity to consume and to emit as a potential explanation.

Keywords: Inequality, Planetary boundaries, Socio-economic minimum standards, Social-environmental goal trade-off

Suggested Citation

Flechtner, Svenja and Middelanis, Martin, Income inequality and the trade-off between socio-economic and ecological goals (February 10, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5130785 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5130785

Svenja Flechtner

University of Siegen - School of Economic Disciplines ( email )

Hoelderlinstrasse 3
57068 Siegen
Germany

Martin Middelanis (Contact Author)

Free University of Berlin (FUB) - Department of Business and Economics ( email )

Boltzmannstrasse 20
D-14195 Berlin, 14195
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
90
Abstract Views
302
Rank
626,677
PlumX Metrics