Controlling Military Artificial Intelligence: Harnessing Rules of Engagement and Military Directives

33 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2025 Last revised: 13 Feb 2025

See all articles by Jonathan Kwik

Jonathan Kwik

T.M.C. Asser Institute

Marten Zwanenburg

University of Amsterdam

Cheya Took

T.M.C. Asser Instituut

Joep Aarts

Dutch Ministry of Defense

Date Written: February 03, 2025

Abstract

In November 2024, the DILEMA and ELSA Lab Defence Projects convened a multidisciplinary team of legal, military, and technical experts at the Asser Institute in The Hague to explore how Rules of Engagement (ROE), alongside other military directives, could be harnessed control to the use of military artificial intelligence (AI). The central challenge: Can military protocols effectively address the unpredictable and rapidly evolving nature of AI in modern warfare? The workshop focused on two primary questions. First, it considered whether traditional numbered ROE could serve as an effective instrument for issuing AI-specific instructions. Second, it explored how authorities responsible for issuing these military directives would interpret and translate complex technical and operational elements into clear, actionable guidelines for the armed forces.

The outcome? While ROE remain foundational to military operations, experts agreed that AI’s inherent complexity and unpredictability may require a new approach - one that calls for flexible context-specific directives capable of addressing the unique challenges posed by this technology. This policy brief underscores the importance of developing such AI-specific directives – crafted through the strategic selection and drafting of various military frameworks – that ensure effective control and compliance with international law. A fictional use case enabled experts to engage directly with the real-world complexities of drafting such guidelines, offering practical examples of how existing frameworks can be adapted to regulate AI systems.

Providing extensive, detailed and actionable recommendations, this brief serves as a critical resource for drafters, offering guidance on how to approach, analyse, and formalise military directives for AI. It advocates for the prioritisation of AI-specific directives that not only uphold legal standards but also improve operational control and efficiency. These findings offer a comprehensive framework for navigating the evolving landscape of military AI with foresight, precision, and responsibility.

Keywords: Military AI, Rules of Engagement (ROE), Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI Governance, International Law, International Humanitarian Law, Military Operations, Command and Control (C2)

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Kwik, Jonathan and Zwanenburg, Marten and Took, Cheya and Aarts, Joep, Controlling Military Artificial Intelligence: Harnessing Rules of Engagement and Military Directives (February 03, 2025). T.M.C. Asser Institute for International & European Law, ASSER Policy Brief No. 2025-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5132731 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5132731

Jonathan Kwik (Contact Author)

T.M.C. Asser Institute ( email )

R.J. Schimmelpennincklaan 20-22
Den Haag, 2517 JN
Netherlands

Marten Zwanenburg

University of Amsterdam ( email )

Spui 21
Amsterdam, 1018 WB
Netherlands

Cheya Took

T.M.C. Asser Instituut ( email )

Joep Aarts

Dutch Ministry of Defense ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
142
Abstract Views
432
Rank
430,456
PlumX Metrics