Dynamic Competition and Digital Platforms

23 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2025

See all articles by Darcy W E Allen

Darcy W E Allen

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University)

Dirk Auer

International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE)

Chris Berg

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University)

Aaron M. Lane

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University)

Geoffrey A. Manne

International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE); IE University - IE Law School

Jason Potts

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University)

Lazar Radic

IE University - IE Law School; International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE)

Date Written: February 14, 2025

Abstract

Submission to the Australian Treasury Consultation on a New Digital Competition Regime
The Australian Treasury’s proposed competition regime for digital platforms is flawed and should not proceed. The policy rationale for an ex ante regime is unjustified. The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) already provides a comprehensive framework to address concerns such as market power, unfair contract terms, and self-preferencing. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has not demonstrated any compelling reason existing competition laws are insufficient to regulate digital platforms and has not sought to enforce them against digital platforms. The proposed regime is based on a misunderstanding of competition in the digital economy. Digital markets are characterised by dynamic competition, where innovation and technological change are the primary drivers of consumer welfare. The proposed ex ante regime, with its focus on static competition, may dampen innovation incentives and create barriers to technology diffusion, harming Australian consumers and businesses in the long run. Competition policy for digital platforms should be based on a dynamic competition approach that fosters innovation.The proposed regulatory mechanisms are problematic. The reliance on subordinate legislation for crucial policy decisions is inappropriate, reducing parliamentary oversight. This approach lacks transparency and accountability, and may lead to unintended consequences for the digital economy. We urge the Australian Treasury to reconsider its approach to regulating digital platforms. Instead of imposing an ex ante regime, the focus should be on enforcing existing competition laws and fostering a dynamic environment of innovation. This approach would better serve Australia’s long-term economic interests and the continued growth of the digital sector.

Keywords: Ex Ante Competition, Dynamic Competition Policy, Competition Policy, Digital Platform, Digital Platforms Competition Policy

Suggested Citation

Allen, Darcy W E and Auer, Dirk and Berg, Chris and Lane, Aaron M. and Manne, Geoffrey and Potts, Jason and Radic, Lazar, Dynamic Competition and Digital Platforms (February 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5141815 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5141815

Darcy W E Allen (Contact Author)

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) ( email )

Melbourne, 3000
Australia

Dirk Auer

International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) ( email )

5005 SW Meadows Rd.
Suite 300
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://laweconcenter.org/author/dirkauer/

Chris Berg

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) ( email )

124 La Trobe Street
Melbourne, 3000
Australia

Aaron M. Lane

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) ( email )

124 La Trobe Street
Melbourne, 3000
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.rmit.edu.au/contact/staff-contacts/academic-staff/l/lane-dr-aaron

Geoffrey Manne

International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) ( email )

1104 NW 15th Ave.
Suite 300
Portland, OR 97209
United States
503-770-0076 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.laweconcenter.org

IE University - IE Law School ( email )

Madrid
Spain

Jason Potts

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog (RMIT University) ( email )

Lazar Radic

IE University - IE Law School ( email )

Madrid, Madrid
Spain

International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) ( email )

1104 NW 15th Ave STE 300
Portland, OR OR 97209
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
315
Rank
756,990
PlumX Metrics