Optimizing Maize Production: Balancing Yield, Quality, and Economic Benefits through planting density - Driven Nutrient Analysis

17 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2025

See all articles by Zhen Wang

Zhen Wang

Shihezi University

Yanan Guo

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Ruizhi Xie

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Keru Wang

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Guoqiang Zhang

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Peng Hou

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Jun Xue

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Shang Gao

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Dongping Shen

Shihezi University

Liang Fang

Shihezi University

Linli Zhou

Shihezi University

Lirong Sun

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center

Shijun Bao

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center

Zhigang Huo

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center

Bo Ming

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Shaokun Li

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)

Abstract

To investigate the changes in grain nutrient content and test weight with increased maize yield and explore strategies to balance benefits for growers and processing enterprises, a two-year density test was conducted on two maize hybrids with different genotypes. The results showed that higher planting density increased grain yield by 0.26-2.93 t ha-1. The variation trends of nutrient component yields and grain yield were similar, peaking at 9.0×104 plants ha-1. Although significant  differences in test weight were observed among treatments, all values exceeded 720 kg m-3, with no difference in grade. Protein content decreased by 0.18-1.19%, while starch and oil contents increased by 0.25-1.51% and 0.04-0.34%, respectively. The study used the product of nutrient content and test weight, named nutritional test weight for evaluating maize quality as a new indicator. Protein test weight significantly decreased with increased planting density, whereas starch test weight peaked at 9.0×104 plants ha-1 before gradually declining. Simulated maize pricing models based on nutrient component test weight effectively reflected yield and quality changes, enabling more reasonable pricing compared to traditional grade-based models. The new indicators better balanced the economic benefits for growers and processing enterprises, offering a practical approach to optimizing maize production and processing outcomes.

Keywords: planting density, Maize quality, Protein test weight, Starch test weight, Pricing model, economic benefits

Suggested Citation

Wang, Zhen and Guo, Yanan and Xie, Ruizhi and Wang, Keru and Zhang, Guoqiang and Hou, Peng and Xue, Jun and Gao, Shang and Shen, Dongping and Fang, Liang and Zhou, Linli and Sun, Lirong and Bao, Shijun and Huo, Zhigang and Ming, Bo and Li, Shaokun, Optimizing Maize Production: Balancing Yield, Quality, and Economic Benefits through planting density - Driven Nutrient Analysis. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5158738 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5158738

Zhen Wang

Shihezi University ( email )

Yanan Guo

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Ruizhi Xie

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Keru Wang

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Guoqiang Zhang

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Peng Hou

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Jun Xue

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Shang Gao

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Dongping Shen

Shihezi University ( email )

Liang Fang

Shihezi University ( email )

Linli Zhou

Shihezi University ( email )

China

Lirong Sun

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center ( email )

Shijun Bao

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center ( email )

Zhigang Huo

Tongliao Agricultural and Livestock Product Quality and Safety Center ( email )

Bo Ming (Contact Author)

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Shaokun Li

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
116
PlumX Metrics