Thayerian Deference and Constitutional Interpretation

103 Texas L. Rev. Online (Forthcoming 2025)

8 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2025

See all articles by Michael L. Smith

Michael L. Smith

St. Mary's University School of Law

Date Written: March 06, 2025

Abstract

In this essay, I briefly introduce James Bradley Thayer’s theory of judicial deference and its place in historical debates over judicial review and constitutional interpretation. I then turn to how Thayer’s theory of deference fits into debates over how to interpret the Constitution. I warn against treating mere deference as an alternative to theories like originalism, pragmatism, and common law constitutionalism, as it is better viewed as a theory of adjudication or administration rather than as a theory of interpretation. By clarifying deference’s place in the discussion, one might avoid muddling or overclaiming discussions of interpretive theories. Additionally, addressing questions of adjudication and workability brings them the attention they deserve in a literature that tends to overemphasize theoretical coherence while overlooking whether it is workable.

Keywords: constitutional interpretation, constitutional law, deference, Thayer, interpretation, adjudication

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Smith, Michael L., Thayerian Deference and Constitutional Interpretation (March 06, 2025). 103 Texas L. Rev. Online (Forthcoming 2025), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5168534 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5168534

Michael L. Smith (Contact Author)

St. Mary's University School of Law ( email )

One Camino Santa Maria St
San Antonio, TX 78228
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
31
Abstract Views
130
PlumX Metrics