A Critique of John Yoo on Ex parte Merryman
4 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2025 Last revised: 11 Apr 2025
Date Written: April 11, 2025
Abstract
Here, on Civitas, Professor John Yoo continues, as he has in the past, to give voice to the standard Ex parte Merryman (1861) narrative, but that narrative cannot be supported in light of current scholarship.[1]
[1] See, e.g., Seth Barrett Tillman, Merryman Redux: A Response to Professor John Yoo, 22 Chap. L. Rev. 1 (2019); http://www.chapmanlawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Tillman.pdf. See generally Seth Barrett Tillman, Ex parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, 224(2) Mil. L. Rev. 481 (2016) (peer review).
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tillman, Seth Barrett, A Critique of John Yoo on Ex parte Merryman (April 11, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5213439 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5213439
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN