Intex v. Ericsson - The Intersection of Patent and Competition Law in India in Jorge Contreras (ed.), Cases in Context - Leading FRAND Cases around the World (Elgar 2025)

18 Pages Posted: 1 May 2025 Last revised: 12 Apr 2025

See all articles by Enrico Bonadio

Enrico Bonadio

City University London, The City Law School

Mahak Kansara

Bar Council of India

Date Written: March 06, 2025

Abstract

This is an analysis of the 2023 judgment by the High Court of Delhi in Intex v Ericsson. The ruling is important as it has provided guidance for determining the appropriate forum in India to adjudicate on FRAND issues in the face of long-running competition law complaints. The case has also set a precedent for future licensing negotiations in India, seeking to bring Indian case law on these issues in line with other countries’ case law. The paper briefly discusses the most important issues dealt with by the Delhi High Court, i.e. (a) the injunctive relief; (b) the royalty quantification criteria; (c) the global license approach; and (d) confidentiality aspects.

Suggested Citation

Bonadio, Enrico and Kansara, Mahak, Intex v. Ericsson - The Intersection of Patent and Competition Law in India in Jorge Contreras (ed.), Cases in Context - Leading FRAND Cases around the World (Elgar 2025) (March 06, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5215194 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5215194

Enrico Bonadio (Contact Author)

City University London, The City Law School ( email )

London, EC1V OHB
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.city.ac.uk/law/

Mahak Kansara

Bar Council of India ( email )

New Delhi
New Delhi, Delhi 825301
India

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Abstract Views
205
Rank
808,227
PlumX Metrics