Repugnant Work

Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2025-31

Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2025-06

Forthcoming, Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Work (Julian Jonker and Grant Rozeboom, eds.)

16 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2025 Last revised: 21 Apr 2025

Date Written: April 21, 2025

Abstract

This chapter discusses the repugnant income generating activities ("RIGA") of phase I medical research ("guinea pigging"), sex work, and plasma donation. Though each is a robust industry and substantial source of income and professional identity for many providers, significant debate surrounds whether participants in these industries are engaged in work, despite the subjective attitudes of participants themselves and objective similarities to other jobs. The continued invocation of false distinctions between RIGA and other work is thus best explained by discomfort with "dirty work" than to any unique concerns about effort, excellence, meaningfulness, or community. Whether RIGA is work carries consequences, albeit not the ones that many observers believe. But recognizing RIGA as work could impact the stigma faced by RIGA participants and subtly empower them to advocate for fair treatment by acknowledging their important role in the economy and society. 

Suggested Citation

Krawiec, Kimberly D., Repugnant Work (April 21, 2025). Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2025-31, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2025-06, Forthcoming, Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Work (Julian Jonker and Grant Rozeboom, eds.), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225038 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5225038

Kimberly D. Krawiec (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
7
Abstract Views
160
PlumX Metrics