Masking Redistribution (or its Absence)
30 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2004
Date Written: July 16, 2004
Abstract
Research has shown that people vary widely in their support or opposition to progressive taxation. We argue here that the perception of progressiveness itself is affected by the nature of the tax system and by the way it is framed, or presented. Experiments conducted over the World-Wide Web and using within-subject design demonstrate that subjects suffer from a range of heuristics and biases in understanding and supporting progressive or redistributive taxation. After reviewing some prior results, we report four new studies. Two of them indicate that people do not sufficiently appreciate the reduction of progressiveness that results from the use of tax deductions to partly reimburse private expenditures. The other two indicate that people do not fully appreciate the reduction in progressiveness that results from cuts in government services.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Distribution of Payroll and Income Tax Burdens, 1979-1999
By Andrew Mitrusi and James M. Poterba
-
The Humpty Dumpty Blues: Disaggregation Bias in the Evaluation Of Tax Systems
-
Statistical, Identifiable and Iconic Victims and Perpetrators
By George Loewenstein, Deborah Small, ...
-
Framing and Taxation: Evaluation of Tax Policies Involving Household Composition
-
Tax Policy Design in the Presence of Social Preferences: Some Experimental Evidence
By Lucy F. Ackert, Jorge Martinez-vazquez, ...