46 Pages Posted: 24 May 2004
Date Written: April 2004
It is a common assumption that regions within the same country converge to approximately the same steady-state income levels. The so-called absolute convergence hypothesis focuses on initial income levels to account for the variability in income growth among regions. Empirical data seem to support the absolute convergence hypothesis for U.S. states, but the data also show that natural resource-abundance is a significant negative determinant of growth. We find that natural resource abundance decreases investment, schooling, openness, and R&D expenditure and increases corruption, and we show that these effects can fully explain the negative effect of natural resource abundance on growth.
Keywords: Natural resources, Growth, Transmission channels
JEL Classification: C21, O13, O51, Q33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Papyrakis, Elissaios and Gerlagh, Reyer, Resource-Abundance and Economic Growth in the U.S. (April 2004). FEEM Working Paper No. 62.04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=545662 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.545662