Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics

24 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2004

See all articles by Adam M. Hedgecoe

Adam M. Hedgecoe

University of Sussex - School of Social Sciences & Cultural Studies

Abstract

This article attempts to show a way in which social science research can contribute in a meaningful and equitable way to philosophical bioethics. It builds on the social science critique of bioethics present in the work of authors such as Renee Fox, Barry Hoffmaster and Charles Bosk, proposing the characteristics of a critical bioethics that would take social science seriously.

The social science critique claims that traditional philosophical bioethics gives a dominant role to idealised, rational thought, and tends to exclude social and cultural factors, relegating them to the status of irrelevancies. Another problem is the way in which bioethics assumes social reality divides down the same lines/categories as philosophical theories.

Critical bioethics requires bioethicists to root their enquires in empirical research, to challenge theories using evidence, to be reflexive and to be sceptical about the claims of other bioethicists, scientists and clinicians. The aim is to produce a rigorous normative analysis of lived moral experience.

Suggested Citation

Hedgecoe, Adam M., Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics. Bioethics, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 120-143, April 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=547484

Adam M. Hedgecoe (Contact Author)

University of Sussex - School of Social Sciences & Cultural Studies ( email )

Department of Sociology
Falmer, Brightonm BN1 9QN
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
2,319
PlumX Metrics