23 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2004
In this paper we will analyse the issue of defeasibility in the law, taking into account research carried out in philosophy, artificial intelligence and legal theory. We will adopt a very general idea of legal defeasibility, in which we will include all different ways in which certain legal conclusions may need to be abandoned, though no mistake was made in deriving them. We will argue that defeasibility in the law involves three different aspects, which we will call inference-based defeasibility, process-based defeasibility, and theory-based defeasibility. Only the integration of these three perspectives allows us to provide a satisfactory account of the role of defeasibility in legal reasoning.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Prakken, Henry and Sartor, Giovanni, The Three Faces of Defeasibility in the Law. Ratio Juris, Vol. 17, pp. 118-139, March 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=548098
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: raju.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.