Explaining Reform Deadlocks
24 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2004
Date Written: 2004
Abstract
Countries are often slow to adjust their economic structures to new necessities although this reform reluctance is costly in terms of growth and employment. This paper analyses the relevant factors that block or foster economic reforms. Theoretical considerations show that there are at least three classes of potentially relevant factors: the objective need for reforms, political-economic issues and factors associated with limited rationality or rational ignorance. In the empirical analysis, a reform event is quantified as a significant change of the Economic Freedom of the World indicator within a five-year-period. This allows to run probit estimations for a large country panel starting in the 1970s where the probability of reform is explained by a number of proxies covering all three classes of potential factors. The results suggest that the initial extent of economic freedom and growth performance are empirically relevant factors. Furthermore, countries with an ageing population appear to behave less reform friendly.
Keywords: economic policy reforms, economic freedom, reform resistance, limited rationality
JEL Classification: E63, H00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why are Stabilizations Delayed?
By Alberto F. Alesina and Allan Drazen
-
Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the United States
-
Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the U.S. States
-
Why Do Policy Makers Stick to Inefficient Decisions?
By Robert Dur
-
Strong Civil Society as a Double-Edged Sword: Siting Trailers in Post-Katrina New Orleans
By Daniel P. Aldrich and Kevin Crook
-
Disastrous Uncertainty: How Government Disaster Policy Undermines Community Rebound
-
The Impact of Trust on Reforms
By Friedrich Heinemann and Benjamin Tanz
-
Location, Location, Location: Selecting Sites for Controversial Facilities