The Fcc's Name Game: How Shifting Regulatory Classifications Affect Competition
44 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2004
Date Written: April 2004
Abstract
This article examines the consequences in using service definitions as the basis for a vertically driven regulatory regime in telecommunications despite converging markets and technologies. The article examines Internet-mediated telephone service as a case study for showing problems resulting from the Federal Communications Commission'd use of vertical regulatory silos that develop a single regulatory status regardless of whether changed circumstances favor a change in regulation.
Vertical regulation makes it difficult for incumbent stakeholders to change their regulatory classification. Incumbent telephone service providers continue to fit within the basic telecommunications services, common carrier regulatory model even as newcomers manage to provide a competitive alternative that qualifies for little regulation based on the information services classification.
The article proposes the use of a horizontal, layered approach to regulation consistent with what the European Union has endorsed. Adding to what others have written about a layered approach to telecommunications regulation, the article identifies likely difficulties in the implementation of a horizontal regulatory model, and also suggests remedies.
Keywords: Telecommunications, internet, regulation, regulatory asymmetry
JEL Classification: K23, L96, L50
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A General Analysis of Exclusionary Conduct and Refusal to Deal - Why Aspen and Kodak are Misguided
-
Regulatory Reform: The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Fcc Media Ownership Rules
-
Antitrust Law and Mass Media Regulation: Can Merger Standards Protect the Public Interest?
-
By Daniel Lyons
-
FCC Merger Review as an Innovative Control Over Telecommunications Market in the Age of Deregulation
By Ju Young Lee