Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints
Posted: 16 Jun 2004
Abstract
Judicial lawmaking in the WTO is marked by elastic interpretive discourse and constitutional rules that do not serve as a meaningful restraint. Politics, however, constrains both discursive and constitutional latitude, which should alleviate concerns that WTO judicial lawmaking is so expansive as to undermine the sovereignty of powerful states, create a serious democratic deficit for their citizens, or catalyze withdrawal of their support for the organization.
Keywords: lawmaking, WTO, activism, judicial activism
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Steinberg, Richard H., Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints. UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 04-9, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=556810
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.