Solving the Value Metrics Puzzle
42 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2004
Date Written: July 15, 2004
Abstract
On theoretical grounds, shareholder returns should be better explained by some version of residual income (operating profit minus a capital charge) than by a profit number solely. However, empirical evidence indicates the opposite. We first investigate whether this 'value metrics puzzle' may be due to the measurement problems met when quantifying the cost of capital. Our results suggest that these problems do indeed negatively affect the explanatory power of residual income. Secondly, after robustness handling the results further improve and we find strong evidence that 'residual income beats earnings'. A third finding is that the market-derived way of determining the cost of capital generally dominates the CAPM-based one.
Keywords: Performance measure selection, cost of capital, CAPM
JEL Classification: G30, G32, M40, M50
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christine Botosan and Marlene Plumlee
-
By Christine Botosan and Marlene Plumlee
-
By Paul M. Healy and Krishna Palepu
-
Information and the Cost of Capital
By Maureen O'hara and David Easley
-
Toward an Implied Cost of Capital
By William R. Gebhardt, Charles M.c. Lee, ...
-
Toward an Ex Ante Cost-of-Capital
By William R. Gebhardt, Charles M.c. Lee, ...
-
The World Price of Insider Trading
By Utpal Bhattacharya and Hazem Daouk
-
The Market Pricing of Earnings Quality
By Jennifer Francis, Ryan Lafond, ...