Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility
University of Zurich Economics Working Paper No. 76
30 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2004
There are 2 versions of this paper
Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility
Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility
Date Written: June 15, 2004
Abstract
People not only obtain utility from actual outcomes but also from the conditions which lead to these outcomes. The paper proposes an economic concept of this notion of procedural utility. Preferences beyond outcome can be manifold. We distinguish procedural utility people get from institutions as such, i.e. from how allocative and redistributive decisions are taken, procedural utility from activities towards which people have an intrinsic attitude and procedural utility from the way being treated in interaction with other people. In an empirical application, it is studied whether people gain procedural utility from participating in the political decision-making process itself, irrespective of the outcome. Utility is measured by individuals' reported subjective well-being. We find that participation rights provide procedural utility in terms of a feeling of self-determination and influence. In contrast, actual participation and use of participation rights does not.
Keywords: Procedural utility, subjective well-being, political participation, participation
JEL Classification: D60, D63, D72, H73, I31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Iris Bohnet and Richard J. Zeckhauser
-
By Iris Bohnet and Richard J. Zeckhauser
-
By Catherine C. Eckel and Rick K. Wilson
-
By Nava Ashraf, Iris Bohnet, ...
-
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games
By Frank Heinemann, Rosemarie Nagel, ...
-
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games
By Frank Heinemann and Peter Ockenfels
-
Status and Distrust: The Relevance of Inequality and Betrayal Aversion
By Kessely Hong and Iris Bohnet