Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being
45 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2004
There are 2 versions of this paper
Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being
Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being
Abstract
This paper investigates whether individuals feel worse off when others around them earn more. In other words, do people care about relative position and does "lagging behind the Joneses" diminish well-being? To answer this question, I match individual-level panel data containing a number of indicators of well-being to information about local average earnings. I find that, controlling for an individual's own income, higher earnings of neighbors are associated with lower levels of self-reported happiness. The data's panel nature and rich set of measures of well-being and behavior indicate that this association is not driven by selection or by changes in the way people define happiness. There is suggestive evidence that the negative effect of increases in neighbors' earnings on own well-being is most likely caused by interpersonal preferences, i.e. people having utility functions that depend on relative consumption in addition to absolute consumption.
Keywords: Microeconomics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Comparison Utility in a Growth Model
By Christopher D. Carroll, Jody R. Overland, ...
-
Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
By Bruno S. Frey, Simon Luechinger, ...
-
Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach
By Alois Stutzer, Simon Luechinger, ...
-
Optimal Taxation When Consumers Have Endogenous Benchmark Levels of Consumption
-
Frustrated Achievers: Winners, Losers, and Subjective Well Being in New Market Economies
By Carol Graham and Stefano Pettinato
-
Optimal Taxation When Consumers Have Benchmark Levels of Consumption