43 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2005
In this paper I mediate between the reality that securitizations serve useful, efficient purposes and the goal of preventing unnecessary corporate liquidations. Starting from the premise that the decision to include any party in a chapter 11 reorganization involves line drawing, I explain a principled reason for excluding some securitizations from the scope of chapter 11, while including other transactions - such as many of those at issue in Enron. Specifically, by considering the reasons why we ignore formalities in other related situations - under veil piercing, equitable subordination, and fraudulent transfer law - I explain why a line can be drawn that excludes typical securitizations from the chapter 11 estate. In the process, I suggest a functional analysis that would be more useful in making these types of determinations than the present reliance on whether or not there has been a true sale of assets as part of the securitization.
Keywords: Securitization, Structured Finance, Chapter 11, Bankruptcy, Corporate Finance
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lubben, Stephen J., Beyond True Sales - Securitization and Chapter 11. N.Y.U. Journal of Law & Business, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=576261