Joe Cannon and the Minority Party: Tyranny or Bipartisanship
Stanford GSB Research Paper No. 1858
38 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2004
Date Written: July 2004
Abstract
The minority party is rarely featured in empirical research on parties in legislatures, and recent theories of parties in legislatures are rarely neutral and balanced in their treatment of the two parties. This paper makes a case for redressing this imbalance. We identify four characteristics of bipartisanship and evaluate their descriptive merits in a purposely hostile testing ground: during the rise and fall of Speaker Joseph G. Cannon, a.k.a., the Tyrant from Illinois. Drawing on century-old recently discovered records now available in the National Archives, we find that Cannon was anything but a majority-party tyrant during the important committee assignment phase of legislative organization. The findings underscore the need for future, more explicitly theoretical research on parties-in-legislatures.
Keywords: legislation/regulation, politics, political parties
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By James J. Heckman and James M. Snyder
-
The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress
By Nolan Mccarty, Keith T. Poole, ...
-
By Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal
-
On Measuring Partisanship in Roll Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877-1999
By Gary W. Cox and Keith T. Poole
-
The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting
-
Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives
By Gary W. Cox, Mikitaka Masuyama, ...
-
Congressional Party Defection in American History
By Timothy P. Nokken and Keith T. Poole