Citations (7)


Footnotes (297)



The Constitutional Right Against Excessive Punishment

Youngjae Lee

Fordham University School of Law

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 91, May 2005

When is a death sentence, a sentence of imprisonment, or a fine so "excessive" or "disproportionate" in relation to the crime for which it is imposed that it violates the Eighth Amendment? Despite the urgings of various commentators and the Supreme Court's own repeated, albeit uncertain, gestures in the direction of proportionality regulation by the judiciary, the Court's answer to this question within the past few decades is a body of law that is messy and complex, yet largely meaningless as a constraint. In the core of this ineffectual and incoherent proportionality jurisprudence lies a conceptual confusion over the meaning of proportionality. The Court's latest statement on this question, Ewing v. California, is symptomatic of the Court's confusion. This Article seeks to prepare the ground for a more coherent and potent jurisprudence of proportionality to develop by clarifying the concept of proportionality. First, this Article describes the way in which the Court's confusion over the meaning of "proportionality" has been the source of the problem by discussing four different ways in which the Court has understood the term. Second, this Article proposes "retributivism as a side constraint" as a conception of proportionality that would bring together the disparate elements of the case law to establish a more coherent and effective constitutional doctrine. Third, this Article specifies the meaning of retributivism as a side constraint, emphasizing the distinction between comparative and noncomparative aspects of retributivism and the significance of the distinction for understanding not only what it means for one to "deserve" a punishment, but also the Supreme Court case law on excessive punishment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Proportionality, Punishment, Eighth Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishments, Roper v. Simmons, Ewing v. California, Capital Punishment

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 15, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Lee, Youngjae, The Constitutional Right Against Excessive Punishment. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 91, May 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=584541

Contact Information

Youngjae Lee (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-7662 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,013
Downloads: 328
Download Rank: 68,380
Citations:  7
Footnotes:  297