Positive, Normative and Functional Schools in Law and Economics

25 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 2004

See all articles by Francesco Parisi

Francesco Parisi

University of Minnesota - Law School; University of Bologna


During its relatively short history, the law and economics movement has developed three distinct schools of thought. The first two schools of thought, often referred to as the Chicago or positive school and the Yale or normative school, developed almost concurrently. The functional school of law and economics, which developed subsequently, draws from public choice theory and the constitutional perspective of the Virginia school of economics to offer a third perspective which is neither fully positive nor fully normative. Various important methodological questions have accompanied the debate between these schools concerning the appropriate role of economic analysis in the institutional design of lawmaking and the limits of methods of evaluation of social preferences and aggregate welfare in policy analysis. These debates have contributed to the growing intellectual interest in the economic analysis of law.

Keywords: Law and Economics, Intellectual History, Methodology

JEL Classification: K00, B0, B5, B25, B41

Suggested Citation

Parisi, Francesco, Positive, Normative and Functional Schools in Law and Economics. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 259-272, December 2004, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-22, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=586641

Francesco Parisi (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

University of Bologna ( email )

Piazza Scaravilli 1
40126 Bologna, fc 47100

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics