Effective Labor Regulation and Microeconomic Flexibility
34 Pages Posted: 23 Sep 2004 Last revised: 10 Oct 2004
There are 2 versions of this paper
Effective Labor Regulation and Microeconomic Flexibility
Date Written: September 2004
Abstract
Microeconomic flexibility, by facilitating the process of creative-destruction, is at the core of economic growth in modern market economies. The main reason for why this process is not infinitely fast, is the presence of adjustment costs, some of them technological, other institutional. Chief among the latter is labor market regulation. While few economists would object to such a view, its empirical support is rather weak. In this paper we revisit this hypothesis and find strong evidence for it. We use a new sectoral panel for 60 countries and a methodology suitable for such a panel. We find that job security regulation clearly hampers the creative-destruction process, especially in countries where regulations are likely to be enforced. Moving from the 20th to the 80th percentile in job security, in countries with strong rule of law, cuts the annual speed of adjustment to shocks by a third while shaving off about one percent from annual productivity growth. The same movement has negligible effects in countries with weak rule of law.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Creative Destruction and Development: Institutions, Crises, and Restructuring
-
Creative Destruction and Development: Institutions, Crises, and Restructuring
-
Assessing Job Flows Across Countries: The Role of Industry, Firm Size, and Regulations
By John Haltiwanger, Stefano Scarpetta, ...
-
Cross Country Differences in Job Reallocation: The Role of Industry, Firm Size and Regulations
By John Haltiwanger, Stefano Scarpetta, ...
-
By Jasper Hoek
-
A Sub-Regional Development Approach-Transport, International Trade, and Investment Modeled in Space
By Hans-peter Brunner and Peter M. Allen
