Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001
38 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2004 Last revised: 21 Dec 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001
Date Written: September 2004
Abstract
Under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, most U.S. taxpayers received a tax rebate between July and September, 2001. The week in which the rebate was mailed was based on the second-to-last digit of the taxpayer's Social Security number, a digit that is effectively randomly assigned. Using special questions about the rebates added to the Consumer Expenditure Survey, we exploit this historically unique experiment to measure the change in consumption expenditures caused by receipt of the rebate and to test the Permanent Income Hypothesis and related models. We find that households spent about 20-40 percent of their rebates on non-durable goods during the three-month period in which their rebates were received, and roughly another third of their rebates during the subsequent three-month period. The implied effects on aggregate consumption demand are significant. The estimated responses are largest for households with relatively low liquid wealth and low income, consistent with liquidity constraints.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumer Response to the Timing of Income: Evidence from a Change in Tax Withholding
-
Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001
By David Johnson, Jonathan A. Parker, ...
-
The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates - Evidence from Consumer Credit Data
By Sumit Agarwal, Chunlin Liu, ...
-
The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates -- Evidence from Consumer Credit Data
By Sumit Agarwal, Chunlin Liu, ...
-
'3rd of Tha Month': Do Social Security Recipients Smooth Consumption between Checks?
-
Did the 2001 Tax Rebate Stimulate Spending? Evidence from Taxpayer Surveys
-
Is There a Daily Discount Rate? Evidence from the Food Stamp Nutrition Cycle