Performance Rating and Yardstick Competition in Social Service Provision
35 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2004
Date Written: September 2004
Abstract
This paper investigates whether national evaluation of decentralised government performance tends, by lessening local information spill-overs, to reduce the scope for local performance comparisons and consequently to lower the extent of spatial auto-correlation among local government expenditures. It analyses UK local government expenditures on personal social services before and after the introduction of a national performance assessment system (SSPR, Social Services Performance Rating) that would attribute a rating to each local authority. The empirical evidence suggests that the introduction of the SSPR has substantially reduced policy mimicking among neighboring jurisdictions.
Keywords: social services, welfare competition, information spill-overs, spatial autocorrelation
JEL Classification: C21, H72, H77
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Anita Wölfl
-
Comparing Labour Productivity Growth in the OECD Area: The Role of Measurement
By Nadim Ahmad, François Lequiller, ...
-
What Drives Health Care Expenditure? Baumol's Model of 'Unbalanced Growth' Revisited
-
The Service Economy in OECD Countries
By Anita Wölfl
-
Measuring the Interaction between Manufacturing and Services
By Dirk Pilat and Anita Wölfl
-
Mental Health Expenditure in England: A Spatial Panel Approach
By Francesco Moscone, Martin Knapp, ...
-
Medical Care Price Indices: Problems and Opportunities / the Chung-Hua Lectures
-
Health Care Expenditure and Income in the OECD Reconsidered: Evidence from Panel Data
By Badi H. Baltagi and Francesco Moscone