Limiting Liability for Long - Continued Breach of Interstate Water Allocation Compacts

Posted: 12 Oct 2004

See all articles by Douglas L. Grant

Douglas L. Grant

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Abstract

Recent Supreme Court decisions in Texas v. New Mexico and Kansas v. Colorado, involving assessment of damages for long-term breaches of interstate water compacts, have raised the specter of huge liability for breaching states. Thus far the Supreme Court has not dealt with the possibility that time may bar some claims of long-continued breach. The ancient principle of nullum tempus - no time runs against the sovereign - might enable a sovereign plaintiff state to recover damages no matter how old. The nullum tempus principle should not apply in water compact enforcement suits, however, because it would produce little or no public benefit in that situation and because its application would violate the constitutional plan of equal footing for litigating states. With the removal of the principle of nullum tempus, the defenses of either laches or a borrowed statute of limitations may reduce a defendant state's liability for breach of an interstate water compact.

Suggested Citation

Grant, Douglas L., Limiting Liability for Long - Continued Breach of Interstate Water Allocation Compacts. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=601743

Douglas L. Grant (Contact Author)

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
702.270.3866 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
338
PlumX Metrics