A Tyrannosaurus-Rex Aptly Named 'Sue': Using a Disputed Dinosaur to Teach Contract Defenses

16 Pages Posted: 13 Oct 2004

See all articles by Miriam A. Cherry

Miriam A. Cherry

Saint Louis University - School of Law

Abstract

This piece focuses on the discovery of a T-Rex skeleton, and the contract formed between the private fossil collectors and the Native American rancher who ostensibly owned the land where the fossil was situated. Although the fossil was eventually sold at auction for over eight million dollars, the fossil collectors paid the rancher only $5,000 for its excavation. In addition to the rancher, the Sioux tribe and the Department of Justice also became involved in the case.

As described in my work, the law school Socratic method has come under attack in recent years. In response to such criticisms, the lesson that I describe provides a constructive alternative, using problem-based learning and technology. When discussing the contract between the rancher and the fossil hunters, my students effectively analyzed the doctrines of unilateral mistake, unequal bargaining power, unconscionability, and the failure of a condition. Using the T-Rex case is a great way to get law students excited about learning contract defenses.

Keywords: Contract Defenses, Socratic Method, Law School

Suggested Citation

Cherry, Miriam A., A Tyrannosaurus-Rex Aptly Named 'Sue': Using a Disputed Dinosaur to Teach Contract Defenses. North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 2, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=601942

Miriam A. Cherry (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States
314-977-04537 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
339
Abstract Views
3,228
rank
88,881
PlumX Metrics