Bustup Takeovers of Value-Destroying Diversified Firms

Posted: 4 Apr 1995  

Eli Ofek

New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance

Philip G. Berger

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 1994

Abstract

We estimate the effect that value-destroying diversification has on the probabilities of takeover and break-up. Recent papers show that unrelated diversification decreased firm value, that the value loss is reversible, that bidder gains from takeovers are higher when their targets' managers have destroyed more value, and that break-ups and selloffs are a common result of takeovers. Considering these findings together leads us to hypothesize that as the amount of value destroyed by a firm's diversification strategy increases, so does its probability of being taken over and broken up. We find that the value loss from diversification is related to the probabilities of future takeover and of break-up. We show that LBOs are more likely than other acquirers to target value-destroying diversified targets. Finally, for a subsample of large diversified targets, half are broken-up after they are acquired, and the mean value effect of diversification is -22% to -33% for these firms. In contrast, the half not broken-up after takeover have a mean valuation effect from diversification of -3% to 6%.

JEL Classification: G34

Suggested Citation

Ofek, Eli and Berger, Philip G., Bustup Takeovers of Value-Destroying Diversified Firms (October 1994). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6054

Eli Ofek (Contact Author)

New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance ( email )

Stern School of Business
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY 10012-1126
United States

Philip G. Berger

University of Chicago - Booth School of Business ( email )

5807 S. Woodlawn Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-834-8687 (Phone)
773-834-4585 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,272