Compare and Contrast: Perspectives on Board Committees
11 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2004
Abstract
The establishment of board sub-committees has been strongly recommended as a suitable mechanism for improving corporate governance, by delegating specific tasks from the main board to a smaller group and harnessing the contribution of non-executive directors. In the UK, the Cadbury committee proposals focused on audit committees and the Greenbury study group advocated remuneration committees. Over the last decade, most large public companies have set up such committees, but their impact on governance standards has not been widely explored. This paper identifies significant differences in the orientation and operation of these committees. It also draws on interview data collected from participants in audit and remuneration committees to argue that these differences may lead to unacknowledged pressures on non-executive directors who form the membership of both committees. Given the current focus on the role of non-executive directors, the impact of such pressure is of particular importance.
Keywords: Audit committee, remuneration committee, non-executive directors
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Impact of the Board on Strategy: An Empirical Examination
-
By Ruth V. Aguilera, Igor Filatotchev, ...
-
Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives
-
Convergence in European Corporate Governance: The Audit Committee Concept
By Paul A. Collier and Mahbub Zaman