Private International Cartels: Effectiveness, Welfare, and Anticartel Enforcement

Purdue Agricultural Economics Working Paper No. 03-12

58 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2004

See all articles by John M. Connor

John M. Connor

American Antitrust Institute (AAI); Purdue University

Date Written: November 2003

Abstract

This paper presents and analyses economic data on 167 international cartels that were discovered by antitrust authorities after January 1990. The median cartel had five corporate members and generated $1.2 billion in sales during the collusive period. Nearly 40% of affected sales occurred in the organic chemicals industries, half of which were sold to food, feed, and agricultural firms. On average, the cartels lasted nearly six years, but average durability declined by more than 60% from the early 1990s to the early 2000s. In the early 2000s more than 20 international cartels were discovered each year, a rate six times faster than the early 1990s. The large size and longevity of these cartels, when combined with average monopoly overcharges of 28%, cause a great deal of monetary harm to buyers.

Discovered cartels have met with increasingly harsh sanctions since 1990. Government authorities have imposed a total of $7.1 billion in fines on 870 companies and 62 executives, of which the United States (27%) and European Union (51%) are the major governments responsible. Private antitrust suits resulted in settlements totaling at least $3.4 billion. Some 32 executives have been imprisoned.

Statutory penalties, if imposed at maximum levels, would extract about 12 times cartel overcharges, a level sufficient to deter most firms from forming or joining a cartel. However, applying optimal deterrence concepts to the characteristics of modern international cartels allows one to deduce that current antitrust enforcement is inadequate to deter cartel formation. This conclusion follows from low probabilities of detection, overly generous leniency policies in fine-setting, the absence of private suits outside North America, the inability of most indirect purchasers to recover damages, and generally weak anti-cartel enforcement in Asia and Latin America.

Keywords: International cartels, collusion, price fixing, antitrust law, optimal deterrence

JEL Classification: K33, L11, L13, L41

Suggested Citation

Connor, John M. and Connor, John M., Private International Cartels: Effectiveness, Welfare, and Anticartel Enforcement (November 2003). Purdue Agricultural Economics Working Paper No. 03-12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=611909 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.611909

John M. Connor (Contact Author)

Purdue University ( email )

333 Massachusetts Ave.
UNIT 505
Indianapolis, IN 46204
United States
+1 463-221-1692 (Phone)

American Antitrust Institute (AAI) ( email )

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-536-3408 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.antitrustinstitute.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
955
Abstract Views
5,119
Rank
46,784
PlumX Metrics