Does Soft Dollar Brokerage Benefit Portfolio Investors: Agency Problem or Solution?
37 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2004
Date Written: March 2004
Abstract
With soft dollar brokerage, institutional portfolio managers pay brokers "premium" commission rates in exchange for rebates they use to buy third-party research. One hypothesis views this practice as a reflection of the agency problem in delegated portfolio management; another views it as a contractual solution to the agency problem that aligns the incentives of investors, managers, and brokers where direct monitoring mechanisms are inadequate. Using a database of institutional money managers, we find that premium commission payments are positively related to risk-adjusted performance, suggesting that soft dollar brokerage is a solution to agency problems. Moreover, premium commissions are positively related to management fees, suggesting that labor market competition does not punish managers for using soft dollars.
Keywords: Portfolio choice, Investment Decisions
JEL Classification: G11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Beyond Disclosure: The Case for Banning Contingent Commissions
-
The Impact of Soft Dollars on Market Equilibrium and Investors' Profits
By Gilad Livne and Brett Trueman
-
The Surprising Virtues of the New Financial Privacy Law
By Peter Swire
-
By Mark Abrahamson, Tim Jenkinson, ...
-
The Small Laws: Eliot Spitzer and the Way to Insurance Market Reform
-
Smart Mortgages, Privacy and the Regulatory Possibility of Infomediation
-
Are Existing Stock Broker Standards Sufficient? Principles, Rules and Fiduciary Duties