Why Frequency Matters for Unit Root Testing
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI 2004-119/4
17 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2004
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
It is generally believed that for the power of unit root tests, only the time span and not the observation frequency matters. In this paper, we show that the observation frequency does matter when the high-frequency data display fat tails and volatility clustering, as is typically the case for financial time series such as exchange rate returns. Our claim builds on recent work on unit root and cointegration testing based non-Gaussian likelihood functions. The essential idea is that such methods will yield power gains in the presence of fat tails and persistent volatility clustering, and the strength of these features (and hence the power gains) increases with the observation frequency. This is illustrated using both Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications to real exchange rates.
Keywords: Fat tails, GARCH, mean reversion, observation frequency, purchasing-power parity, unit roots
JEL Classification: C12, C22, F31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Charles M. Engel and John H. Rogers
-
Perspectives on PPP and Long-Run Real Exchange Rates
By Kenneth Froot and Kenneth Rogoff
-
A Panel Project on Purchasing Power Parity: Mean Reversion within and between Countries
-
Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run
By Niso Abuaf and Philippe Jorion
-
Convergence to the Law of One Price Without Trade Barriers or Currency Fluctuations
By David C. Parsley and Shang-jin Wei
-
Explaining the Border Effect: The Role of Exchange Rate Variability, Shipping Costs, and Geography
By David C. Parsley and Shang-jin Wei
