An Economic Evaluation of the Moneyball Hypothesis
20 Pages Posted: 13 Nov 2004
Date Written: October 20, 2005
Abstract
Michael Lewis's book, Moneyball, is the story of an innovative manager who exploits an inefficiency in baseball's labor market over a prolonged period of time. We evaluate this claim by applying standard econometric procedures to data on player productivity and compensation from 1999 to 2004. These methods support Lewis's argument that the valuation of different skills was inefficient in the early part of this period, and that this was profitably exploited by managers with the ability to generate and interpret statistical knowledge. This knowledge became increasingly dispersed across baseball teams during this period. Consistent with Lewis's story and economic reasoning, the spread of this knowledge is associated with the market correcting the original mis-pricing.
Keywords: Innovation, market correction, salaries and compensation, baseball
JEL Classification: J31, O33, L83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Piece Rate vs. Time Rate: The Effect of Incentives on Earnings
By Eric Seiler
-
Potential, Prizes and Performance: Testing Tournament Theory with Professional Tennis Data
By Uwe Sunde
-
Contests, Grand Prizes, and the Hot Hand
By Todd Mcfall, Charles R. Knoeber, ...
-
Incentives versus Sorting in Tournaments: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Edwin Leuven, Hessel Oosterbeek, ...
-
Incentives Versus Sorting in Tournaments: Evidence from a Field Experiment
By Edwin Leuven, Hessel Oosterbeek, ...
-
Team Performance, Efficiency and Wage Distribution in Professional Baseball