Vertical Equity Consequences of Very High Cigarette Tax Increases: If the Poor are the Ones Smoking, How Could Cigarette Tax Increases Be Progressive?
52 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2004 Last revised: 26 Oct 2022
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
Cigarette smoking is concentrated among low income groups. Consequently, cigarette taxes are considered regressive. However, if poorer individuals are much more price sensitive than richer individuals, then tax increases would reduce smoking much more among the poor and their cigarette tax expenditures as a share of income would rise by much less than for the rich. Warner (2000) said this phenomenon would make cigarette tax increases progressive. We test this empirically. Among low-, middle-, and high-income, we estimate total price elasticities of -0.37, -0.35, and -0.20, respectively. We find that cigarette tax increases are not close to progressive using both tax expenditure-based and traditional welfare measures. This finding is robust to cross-border purchasing, generic cigarettes, and substantial external effects. However, we find that taxes can be progressive under some behavioral economic models (Gruber & Koszegi, 2004) but that these may only apply to a small share of smokers.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Is Addiction "Rational"? Theory and Evidence
By Jonathan Gruber and Botond Koszegi
-
An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction
By Gary S. Becker, Michael Grossman, ...
-
The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage Smoking
By Eugene M. Lewit, Douglas Coate, ...
-
Price, Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Among Young Adults
By Frank J. Chaloupka and Henry Wechsler
-
Youth Smoking in the U.S.: Evidence and Implications
By Jonathan Gruber and Jonathan Zinman
-
An Empirical Analysis of Alcohol Addiction: Results from the Monitoring the Future Panels
By Michael Grossman, Frank J. Chaloupka, ...