Strict Liability for Gatekeepers: A Reply to Professor Coffee

10 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2004  

Frank Partnoy

University of San Diego School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper


This article responds to a proposal by Professor John C. Coffee, Jr. for a modified form of strict liability for gatekeepers. Professor Coffee's proposal would convert gatekeepers into insurers, but cap their insurance obligations based on a multiple of the highest annual revenues the gatekeepers recently had received from their wrongdoing clients. My proposal, advanced in 2001, would allow gatekeepers to contract for a percentage of issuer damages, after settlement or judgment, subject to a legislatively-imposed floor. This article compares the proposals and concludes that a contractual system based on a percentage of the issuer's liability would be preferable to a regulatory system with caps based on a multiple of gatekeeper revenues.

Both proposals mark a shift in the scholarship addressing the problem of gatekeeper liability. Until recently, scholarship on gatekeepers had focused on reputation - not regulation or civil liability - as the key limitation on gatekeeper behavior. Indeed, many scholars have argued that liability should not be imposed on gatekeepers in various contexts, and that reputation-related incentives alone would lead gatekeepers to screen against fraudulent transactions and improper disclosure in an optimal way, even in the absence of liability. From a theoretical perspective, this article is an attempt to move the literature away from a focus on reputation to an assessment of a potential reinsurance market for securities risks, where gatekeepers would behave more like insurers than reputational intermediaries.

Keywords: strict liability, gatekeepers, insurance

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K22

Suggested Citation

Partnoy, Frank, Strict Liability for Gatekeepers: A Reply to Professor Coffee. Boston University Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 365, 2004. Available at SSRN:

Frank Partnoy (Contact Author)

University of San Diego School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-2352 (Phone)
619-260-4180 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views