Why is Employment Protection Stricter in Europe than in the Us?
CentER Discussion Paper No. 2001-79
33 Pages Posted: 22 Nov 2004
Date Written: September 17, 2004
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that the reason why the United States prefer a lower level of employment protection than the European countries lies in the differences in gains and costs from geographical mobility. We present a model where labor migration and employment protection are both determined endogenously. The labor market is modeled within a matching framework, where the employment protection reduces both the job finding and firing rates. Countries with low migration costs and high economic heterogeneity may prefer no employment protection so that workers can move quickly to better horizons rather than being maintained in low productive activities.
Keywords: Geographic labor mobility, employment protection, search frictions, voting
JEL Classification: J61, J63, J64
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consequences of Employment Protection? the Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act
By Daron Acemoglu and Joshua D. Angrist
-
Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?
By Alison L. Booth, Marco Francesconi, ...
-
Temporary Jobs, Employment Protection and Labor Market Performance
By Pierre Cahuc and Fabien Postel-vinay
-
The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets
By James J. Heckman and Carmen Pages
-
Why Do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training?
-
Drawing Lessons from the Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain
By Juan Jose Dolado, Carlos García Serrano, ...
-
Drawing Lessons from the Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain
By Juan F. Jimeno, Juan Jose Dolado, ...
-
Why Do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training?