The Cost of Business Cycles and the Benefits of Stabilization: A Survey
33 Pages Posted: 13 Dec 2004 Last revised: 10 Nov 2022
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on the cost of U.S. post-War business cycle fluctuations. I argue that recent work has established this cost is considerably larger than initial work found. However, despite the large cost of macroeconomic volatility, it is not obvious that policymakers should have pursued a more aggressive stabilization policy than they did. Still, the fact that volatility is so costly suggests stable growth is a desirable goal that ought to be maintained to the extent possible, just as policymakers are currently required to do under the Balanced Growth and Full Employment Act of 1978. This survey was prepared for the Economic Perspectives, a publication of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Using Asset Prices to Measure the Cost of Business Cycles
By Fernando Alvarez and Urban J. Jermann
-
Evaluating Risky Consumption Paths: the Role of Intertemporal Substitutability
-
The Cost of Business Cycles Under Endogenous Growth
By Gadi Barlevy
-
The Cost of Business Cycles Under Endogenous Growth
By Gadi Barlevy
-
Reconsidering the Costs of Business Cycles with Incomplete Markets
By Andrew Atkeson and Christopher Phelan
-
By Kjetil Storesletten, Chris Telmer, ...
-
Technology (and Policy) Shocks in Models of Endogenous Growth
By Larry Jones, Rody Manuelli, ...
-
Recursive Utility, Endogenous Growth, and the Welfare Cost of Volatility
By Anne Epaulard and Aude Pommeret
-
Technology Commitment and the Cost of Economic Fluctuations
By Garey Ramey and Valerie A. Ramey