Alternative Investments: Ctas, Hedge Funds, and Funds-of-Funds

Journal of Investment Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2004

Posted: 10 Dec 2004

See all articles by Bing Liang

Bing Liang

University of Massachusetts Amherst - Department of Finance

Abstract

In this paper, we study alternative investment vehicles such as hedge funds, funds-of-funds, and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) by investigating their performance, risk, and fund characteristics. Considering them as three distinctive investment classes, we study them not only on a stand-alone basis but also on a portfolio basis. We find several interesting results. First, CTAs differ from hedge funds and funds-of-funds in terms of trading strategies, liquidity, and correlation structures. Second, during the period of 1994 to 2001, hedge funds outperform funds-of-funds, which in turn outperform CTAs on a stand-alone basis. These results can be explained by the double fee structure but not survivorship bias. Third, correlation structures for alternative investment vehicles are different under different market conditions. Hedge funds are highly correlated to each other and are not well hedged in the down markets with liquidity squeeze. The negative correlations with other instruments make CTAs suitable hedging instruments for insuring downside risk. When adding CTAs to the hedge fund portfolio or the fund-of-fund portfolio, investors can benefit significantly from the risk-return trade-off.

Keywords: Hedge funds, funds-of-funds, commodity trading advisors

JEL Classification: G00

Suggested Citation

Liang, Bing, Alternative Investments: Ctas, Hedge Funds, and Funds-of-Funds. Journal of Investment Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=629446

Bing Liang (Contact Author)

University of Massachusetts Amherst - Department of Finance ( email )

Amherst, MA 01003
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
897
PlumX Metrics