The Gender Implications of Public Sector Downsizing: The Reform Program of Vietnam
37 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Gender Implications of Public Sector Downsizing: The Reform Program of Vietnam
The Gender Implications of Public Sector Downsizing: The Reform Program of Vietnam
Date Written: March 2001
Abstract
Men and women may be affected differently by the transition from central planning to a market economy and especially by the privatization and restructuring of state-owned enterprises. In Vietnam during the massive downsizing in the early 1990s, many more women than men were laid off. But in the downsizing in the early part of this decade women are less likely than men to be retrenched in large numbers.
Men and women may be affected differently by the transition from central planning to a market economy and especially by the privatization and restructuring of state-owned enterprises. After briefly reviewing the international evidence on this issue, Rama looks at the recent experience of Vietnam and the prospects of its new reform program.
During the massive downsizing in Vietnam in the early 1990s, many more women than men were laid off. Women withdrew from the labor force in larger numbers than men after separation, but the difference nearly vanished after a year. Economic reforms were associated with a considerable decline in the gender gap in earnings, both in the state sector and outside it.
Women are less likely to be retrenched in large numbers in the downsizing in the early part of this decade. Labor redundancies are concentrated in male-dominated sectors, such as mining, transport, and construction; redundancies are smaller in female-dominated sectors, such as footwear, textiles, and garments. Moreover, temporary and short-term contracts are more prevalent in female-dominated sectors, suggesting demand for women's work.
Assistance programs for redundant workers have potential gender biases. Rama shows that separation packages defined as a multiple of earnings favor men more, while lump-sum packages favor women more. Packages based on seniority are roughly gender neutral, but require a substantially higher expenditure to reach the same acceptance rate as the other two.
This paper - a product of Public Service Delivery, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to address social protection issues in the context of economic reforms. The study was supported by the Vietnam Country Office, East Asia and Pacific Region, and by the Bank's Research Support Budget under the research project "Efficient Public Sector Downsizing" (RPO 683-67). The author may be contacted at mrama@worldbank.org.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
An Analysis of the Nature of Unemployment in Sri Lanka
By Kevin Lang and William T. Dickens
-
The Sri Lankan Unemployment Problem Revisited
By Martin Rama
-
The Sri Lankan Unemployment Problem Revisited
By Martin Rama
-
Wage Rates and Job Queues: Does the Public Sector Overpay in Ethiopia?
-
Are Public Sector Workers Underpaid? Appropriate Comparators in a Developing Country
By Sarah Bales and Martin Rama
-
State Ownership and Labor Redundancy: Estimates Based on Enterprise-Level Data from Vietnam
By Patrick Belser and Martin Rama
-
Does Indonesia Have a "Low-Pay" Civil Service?
By Deon Filmer and David L. Lindauer
-
By Liesbet Steer and Markus Taussig
