How Do Banks Manage Liquidity Risk? Evidence from Equity and Deposit Markets in the Fall of 1998
37 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2004 Last revised: 6 Jul 2022
Date Written: December 2004
Abstract
We report evidence from the equity market that unused loan commitments expose banks to systematic liquidity risk, especially during crises such as the one observed in the fall of 1998. We also find, however, that banks with higher levels of transactions deposits had lower risk during the 1998 crisis than other banks. These banks experienced large inflows of funds just as they were needed -- when liquidity demanded by firms taking down funds from commercial paper backup lines of credit peaked. Our evidence suggests that combining loan commitments with deposits mitigates liquidity risk, and that this deposit-lending synergy is especially powerful during period of crises as nervous investors move funds into their banks.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
Private and Public Supply of Liquidity
By Bengt R. Holmström and Jean Tirole
-
Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking
-
Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking
-
Banks as Liquidity Providers: an Explanation for the Co-Existence of Lending and Deposit-Taking
By Anil K. Kashyap, Raghuram G. Rajan, ...
-
Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Co-Existence of Lending and Deposit-Taking
By Anil K. Kashyap, Raghuram G. Rajan, ...