Military Expenditure: Threats, Aid, and Arms Races
23 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: November 2002
Abstract
Using global data for the period 1960-99, Collier and Hoeffler estimate neighborhood arms races. They find that the level of military expenditure is strongly influenced by the expenditure of neighbors. The authors estimate an "arms race multiplier," finding that an initial exogenous increase in military expenditure by one country is more than doubled in both the originating country and its neighbor. An implication is that military expenditure is, to an extent, a "regional public bad."
Potentially, there is an offsetting public good effect if rebellions are deterred by military expenditure. However, instrumenting for military expenditure, the authors find no deterrence effect of military spending on the risk of internal conflict. So there appears to be no regional public good effect offsetting the public bad arising from a neighborhood arms race.
This paper - a product of the Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study the economics of conflict.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Greed and Grievance in Civil War
By Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler
-
By Paul Collier, Anke Hoeffler, ...
-
Causes and Consequences of Civil Strife: Micro-Level Evidence from Uganda
-
Ethnic Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature
-
Poverty, Social Divisions, and Conflict in Nepal
By Lakshmi Iyer and Quy-toan Do
-
Local Conflict in Indonesia: Measuring Incidence and Identifying Patterns
By Patrick Barron, Kai Kaiser, ...
-
Reappraising the Greed and Grievance Explanations for Violent Internal Conflict