The Case for Minimum Teaching Standards

Wharton School Alamanc, 1990

5 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2005 Last revised: 4 Jan 2012

See all articles by J. Scott Armstrong

J. Scott Armstrong

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department

Abstract

The following was sent to the Wharton faculty in November, 1989, challenging a set of proposals by the Wharton Teaching Committee. The committee's proposal was presented as an all or nothing choice. Despite a substantial amount of support for the position stated below, the Wharton Committee recommendations were passed as originally proposed; this includes punitive measures for faculty who get low ratings (referred to below as the committee's Proposal #1). The proposals said that for tenure or promotion, a faculty member must get better than an average rating (3.0 on a five point scale). The vote was close. It seems likely that Proposal #1 would have been defeated had a secret ballot been conducted on this item alone. Action was not taken on any of the nine proposals in my paper, and neither of the proposals on process were accepted. Since that time, faculty from other schools have read the memo and suggested that it be reprinted in Almanac in order to gain further faculty comment. They are concerned that similar events in their schools may affect the quality of the educational environment.

Keywords: Teaching, faculty rating, tenure promotion, wharton teaching committee

Suggested Citation

Armstrong, J. Scott, The Case for Minimum Teaching Standards. Wharton School Alamanc, 1990. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=646623

J. Scott Armstrong (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department ( email )

700 Jon M. Huntsman Hall
3730 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340
United States
215-898-5087 (Phone)
215-898-2534 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/people/faculty/armstrong.cfm

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
733
rank
387,673
PlumX Metrics