Reply to Comment on the Value of Tax Shields is Not Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields
5 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2005
Date Written: June 22, 2004
Abstract
The Comment is thought provoking and helps a lot in rethinking the value of tax shields. However, the conclusion of Fieten, Kruschwitz, Laitenberger, Loffler, Tham, Velez-Pareja and Wonder (2005) is not correct because, as will be proven below, the main result of Fernandez (2004) is correct for several situations.
Equation (16a) shows that the value of tax shields depends only upon the nature of the stochastic process of the net increase of debt.
Keywords: Value of tax shields, Required return to equity, leverage cost, unlevered beta, levered beta
JEL Classification: G12, G31, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Value of Tax Shields is Not Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields
-
Reply to 'the Value of Tax Shields is Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields'
-
The Value of Tax Shields is Not Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields: A Correction
-
The Value of Tax Shields is Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields
By Ian A. Cooper and Kjell G. Nyborg
-
The Value of Tax Shields is Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields
By Ian A. Cooper and Kjell G. Nyborg
-
The Value of Tax Shields is Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields: Further Remarks
By Ian A. Cooper and Kjell G. Nyborg
-
By Ian A. Cooper and Kjell G. Nyborg
-
Comment on 'the Value of Tax Shields is Not Equal to the Present Value of Tax Shields'
By Joseph Tham, Ignacio Velez-pareja, ...