Well-Being and Fairness

Philosophical Studies, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 369-391, 2006

23 Pages Posted: 15 Jan 2005

See all articles by Re'em Segev

Re'em Segev

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law

Abstract

In simple interpersonal conflicts, in which two persons are in danger of harm that it is possible to prevent only partly, there are two, potentially clashing, considerations, each reflecting a different conception of fairness. According to the Equal Chance Principle, the harm for each person should be minimized in a significant and (roughly) equal degree; when this is impossible, each person should be accorded the highest possible equal chance to avoid the harm. According to the Importance Principle, the danger to the person who would otherwise suffer the more serious harm should be prevented. The paper analyses this clash and suggests an outline of a general resolution.

Keywords: Well-Being, Fairness, Impartiality, Consequentialism, Utilitarianism

Suggested Citation

Segev, Re'em, Well-Being and Fairness. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 369-391, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=649042

Re'em Segev (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, 91905
Israel

HOME PAGE: http://en.law.huji.ac.il/people/reem-segev

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
313
Abstract Views
1,370
rank
96,945
PlumX Metrics