Contracting for Information Under Imperfect Commitment
UC Berkeley Competition Policy Center Working Paper No. CPC05-51
35 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2005
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
Organizational theory suggests that authority should lie in the hands of those with information, yet the power to transfer authority is rarely absolute in practice. We investigate the validity and application of this advice in a model of optimal contracting between an uninformed principal and informed agent where the principal's commitment power is imperfect. We show that while full alignment of interests combined with delegation of authority is feasible, it is never optimal. The optimal contract is "bang-bang" - in one region of the state space, full alignment takes place, in the other, no alignment takes place. We then compare these contracts to those in which the principal has full commitment power as well as to several "informal" institutional arrangements.
JEL Classification: D23, D82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Incentives Versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts
By Steven Tadelis and Patrick Bajari
-
Contracting for Government Services: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Cities
By Jonathan Levin and Steven Tadelis
-
Contract Choice, Incentives, and Political Capture in the Public Sector
By Philippe Gagnepain and Marc Ivaldi
-
The Cost of Contract Renegotiation: Evidence from the Local Public Sector
By Philippe Gagnepain, Marc Ivaldi, ...
-
By Amanda M. Girth and Jocelyn Johnston
-
Contracting in the Shadow of the Future
By Anjana Susarla and Ranjani Krishnan
-
Outsourcing and Ownership: Theory and Evidence from California General Care Hospitals