Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements

The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 606-628, July 2002

24 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2005

Abstract

In the event of a conflict between the requirements of the Biosafety Protocol, a multilateral agreement governing the trade in genetically modified organisms, and the requirements of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and associated agreements (collectively WTO Agreements), which treaty's requirements prevail? This question lies as the legal heart of the perceived conflict between trade globalization and environmental protection. This issue is particularly timely given the present trade dispute between the United States and European Union over the European Union's restrictions on the importation of genetically modified agricultural commodities.

In this piece, I analyze the relationship between these agreements. I conclude that while the "savings clause" language ultimately included in the Biosafety Protocol preserves countries' rights and obligations under the WTO Agreements, the Protocol and the WTO Agreements are less on a collision course than some may fear.

Keywords: Biotechnology, genetically engineered products, Biosafety Protocol, GATT, SPS Agreement, World Trade Organization, trade disputes, savings clause, trade and the environment

JEL Classification: F10, K33

Suggested Citation

Safrin, Sabrina, Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 606-628, July 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=658561

Sabrina Safrin (Contact Author)

Rutgers Law School ( email )

NJ 07102
United States
973-353-3243 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
352
Abstract Views
2,305
Rank
153,235
PlumX Metrics